bergeel.com bergeel.com
Home -> About Us -> Add Your Link -> Privacy Policy -> Terms of Use -> Add Your Article
Search:   
Get Free Links
 

Health & Therapy

News & Events

Indoor Games

Recreation & Entertainment

Vehicles & Automotive

Outdoor & Sports

Banking & Finance

Realty & Property

Self Help

Software & Networking

Science & Research

Society & Communities

Food & Recipe

Relationship & Lifestyle

Home Family & Garden

Children

Business & Commerce

Careers & Employment

Shopping & Auction

Medicine & Treatment

Art & Culture

Travel & Accommodation

Law & Politics

Academics & Learning

 

Home –› Outdoor & Sports –› Baseball Game
 

What If Baseball Did Things Differently?

 
Author: Dick Richards
 

I dont know about you, but there are certain things in life that I just dont understand. I would consider myself a big fan of logic, which is why I just dont get major league baseballs playoff system! First off, I applaud baseball for only allowing 8 teams into the post season. I would think that the reason for being so selective in the amount of teams you allow into the post season is to magnify the importance of the regular season. This obviously isnt as high of a priority to sports such as basketball and hockey, which let over fifty percent of their teams into the playoffs. But heres my question: Why not just seed the teams in the order of best record to worst? This would seem to ensure that the top teams are rewarded for their work over a 162 game season, and also make sure that they arent forced to play a higher quality opponent than they should otherwise be matched up against. Seems simple, doesnt it? But no. Apparently it would be way too damaging to the game to have two teams from the same division face off in the 1st round. Unfortunately, when there are only 4 playoff teams in your league to begin with, this doesnt leave you with many other options as far as the matchups go.

What drives me even crazier is that in the early stages of the wild card, I dont even know if they had a system in place! Take 1995 in the American League as an example. The Indians had by far the best record in the game. Next came the Red Sox, Yankees (as the wild card team), and the Mariners who won the West. Ok, so I understand that if the best team played the worst team, then the Yankees would play the Red Sox in round 1. Fine, lets eliminate that and make it so the Indians play the wild card team, the Yankees, who had the 3rd best record, and then the 2nd seeded Rex Sox can play Seattle who finished with the worst record. Well apparently that was too easy. Instead the Indians played the Red Sox, who finished a full seven games ahead of the Yankees but apparently still didnt deserve home field advantage in the first round, and the Mariners hosted the Yankees. If anyone can find logic in that, please let me know. But enough about baseballs stupidity, I dont want to be here all day. The fact is, Ive always wondered if the way baseball chose its matchups actually had any affect on who would eventually win the World Series. Would we have seen a different champion crowned if baseball simply seeded the teams, 1 through 4 in each league, and didnt worry about which division the wild card came from? Well, maybe its not too late.

Lets start with the years that were not affected. The 1995 playoffs would have seen different matchups in the first round and ultimately in the ALCS, but in the end the Braves and Indians would face off for the championship, with the Braves coming out on top. 1998 and 2001 would be totally unaffected (this happened because the wild card team resided in the same division as the team with the best record, but the wild card team had the second or third best record overall). And thank God for that, because the 2001 World Series was one for the ages. The last three years (2003-05) would also be mostly unchanged, with the exception the 2004 National League matchups. The Astros would be forced to play the Cardinals in the first round, and the Braves would play the Dodgers, thus the Astros would go home one round early and the Braves would make it to another NLCS, ultimately losing to the Cards. In the end, the Red Sox break the curse against St Louis. That leaves 5 seasons in which the new format provides us with a strong possibility that a different champion is crowned.

Lets start with 1996. The American League would play out in the same fashion, with the Yankees defeating Baltimore 4 games to 1 in the ALCS. However, there would be a shakeup in the NL playoffs, when the Braves would matchup with the Cardinals in the first round, and division foes San Diego and Los Angeles, the 2nd and 3rd seeds respectively, would also go head to head. In the first matchup, the Braves would also fall behind 3 games to 1 (just as they did in their NLCS matchup with the Cardinals), except this time they wouldnt have time to win the next three, because the 5-game series would be over. The Padres would take care of the Dodgers in 4 games, but fail to take more than 1 game from the Cardinals, who would win the NLCL 4 games to 1. This would leave us with a matchup featuring arguably the two most storied franchises in baseball history. This time there would be no one named Mark Wohlers on the opposing pitching staff to give up a big home run to the Yankees in game 4, and the Cardinals would defeat the Yankees 4 games to 1.

Next we have 1997. Instead of the Mariners getting an early matchup against the #1 seeded Orioles, they would play the Yankees in round one. And just like 1995, it would be a classic 5-game series, with the Mariners again coming out on top. The Indians would still manage to get past the Orioles, this time in round 1, but would lose in six games to the Mariners, who dominated them in the regular season taking 8 of the 11 games. Their opponent would be the Florida Marlins, whose path to the World Series was unchanged by the new seeding. However, the Marlins were unable to solve the brilliance of Randy Johnson, who would win 3 games, including the decisive game 7, and collect the first of his two career World Series MVP awards. Call me crazy, but with a championship under their belt, perhaps Griffey Jr, Arod, and Randy would all have stuck around for a few more years instead of all eventually going elsewhere.

In 1999, the Braves would have a slightly different road to the World Series, but would still get there by first sweeping the Mets, and then beating the Diamondbacks in six games. The AL would be a bit more shaken up. The Yankees and Red Sox would meet in round 1, instead of in the ALCS. Their 1999 ALCS meeting came after a Yankees sweep of the Rangers and a Red Sox tough 5 game tussle with Cleveland. With more fuel left in their tank this time, and coming off a regular season during which the Red Sox took 8 of 12 games against NY, the Red Sox would ride their momentum to a 3 games to 1 victory. The Indians would defeat Texas, but would go on to lose to the Red Sox, who also dominated them in the regular season. However, the curse would have to wait a few more years to be broken, as the Braves duplicated their regular season feat, beating the Red Sox in 4 of 6 games. Can you say team of the 90s?

Moving right along, in the year 2000 the National League playoffs would cruise along without any modifications. In the American League, however, there were some serious shakeups once again. Two AL West foes in Oakland and Seattle would face off in one wild card matchup, and the Yankees would play the White Sox. The top seeded White Sox took care of the Yankees in 4 games, and the As would win in a hard-fought 5 game series versus Seattle. The White Sox took care of the As during the 2000 regular season, and little changed in the ALCS as the White Sox won the series 4 games to 2, moving on to the World Series. Then, in dramatic fashion, the White Sox did what they were not able to do in the previous 82 seasons. They would win their first World Series title since 1917.

Finally we come to 2002. Once again, the NL remains unaffected by the seeding process. In the AL the matchups are reversed, as the Angels play the As and Yankees face the Twins. Oaklands pitching is too much for the Angels explosive offense, and ultimately the As win in 4 hard fought games. The Yankees are pushed to the brink by the upstart Twins, but Minnesota comes up short in a tough 5 game series. For a second straight year the As face the Yankees. But this time, in a seven game series, the As prove to be too much for the Yankees. After falling behind 3 games to 2, the As get back-to-back shut out wins from Tim Hudson and Barry Zito, and Oakland moves on to the World Series. Once again we would have an All-California final, but this time instead of the Angels crashing the party it turns out to be a battle of the Bays, as Oakland takes on San Francisco. The Giants take advantage of Oaklands tired legs early, but in the end the As have too many great arms in their rotation, and Oakland wins it in 6 games. Money Ball has its first title.

So lets recap: The Braves are the team of the 90s, winning 2 World Series titles, 4 pennants, and 8 straight division titles; The White Sox make an early run at being the team of this decade with 2 titles in 6 seasons; Seattle wins a championship, helping to preserve their roster; and the Yankees make several bids for the top prize, but come up short all but once. Think thats crazy? Perhaps. But not as crazy as baseballs current playoff system. Think about it.

Check out more at www.sportslizard.com .

 
 
 

Related Articles

 
8 Tips to Open Water Swimming
 
Loyal Fans of Spring Training
 
How to Buy SEC Championship Tickets
 
How to Find the Best Bicycle Frame
 
Ironman Canada -- About the Race
 
BMX Racing
 
Swimming Pool Safety For Children
 
Gunnison Mountain Biking - From Hartman's Rocks to Deadman Gulch
 
Useful Information About Pools
 
Game Worn Sports Jerseys and Equipment
 
 
 
   Home -> Privacy Policy -> Terms of Use
All Rights Reserved © 2006 www.bergeel.com